United States v. Perrine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in subscriber information given to an internet provider
• explaining that SCA provides statutory remedies for SCA 12 violations and that nonconstitutional “violations of the [SCA] do not warrant exclusion of evidence”
• noting that “[e]very federal court to address this issue has held that subscriber information provided to an internet provider is not protected by the Fourth Amendment’s privacy expectation.”
• explaining that peer-to-peer software that allowed access of defendant’s information to outsiders, “vitiate[d] any expectation of privacy he might have in his computer and its contents”
• holding same in non-sex offender context and stating that “[e]very federal court to address this issue has held that subscriber information provided to an internet provider is not protected by the Fourth Amendment’s privacy expectation”
• collecting cases that hold the Fourth Amendment’s privacy expectation does not apply to IP addresses and ISP subscriber information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).