Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 3/23/2011

United States v. Buenrostro

Citations

  • 638 F.3d 720
  • 79 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 154
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 5918
  • 2011 WL 1023696

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claims “ripe at the time of a prisoner’s first § 2255 proceeding but not discovered until afterward” are considered “second or successive” under § 2255(h)
  • observing that to satisfy § 2244(b)(2)(B)(ii), new evidence must “clearly and convincingly prove the prisoner’s innocence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graber, Kleinfeld, Molloy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Buenrostro

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.