Ninth Circuit· 3/23/2011
United States v. Buenrostro
Citations
- 638 F.3d 720
- 79 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 154
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 5918
- 2011 WL 1023696
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that claims “ripe at the time of a prisoner’s first § 2255 proceeding but not discovered until afterward” are considered “second or successive” under § 2255(h)
- observing that to satisfy § 2244(b)(2)(B)(ii), new evidence must “clearly and convincingly prove the prisoner’s innocence”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Graber, Kleinfeld, Molloy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ezell Gilbert v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 2011-05-19· cited 267×
- Stewart v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 2011-07-14· cited 135×
- Gregory L. Brown v. W. MunizNinth Circuit· 2018-05-08· cited 131×
- Cesar Gonzalez v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2022-03-17· cited 88×
- George Gage v. Kevin ChappellNinth Circuit· 2015-07-20· cited 84×
- United States v. WashingtonNinth Circuit· 2011-08-08· cited 81×
- Curtis Clayton v. Martin BiterNinth Circuit· 2017-08-21· cited 80×
- United States v. David GeozosNinth Circuit· 2017-08-29· cited 78×
- United States v. Clifford WinklesNinth Circuit· 2015-07-31· cited 75×
- United States v. Robert HairstonFourth Circuit· 2014-06-11· cited 49×
- United States v. Khaled ObeidSeventh Circuit· 2013-02-22· cited 31×
- Derrick Young v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2022-01-18· cited 30×
- Gregory Brown v. M. AtchleyNinth Circuit· 2023-08-03· cited 30×
- United States v. Jose BuenrostroNinth Circuit· 2018-07-13· cited 20×
- Lezmond Mitchell v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2020-04-30· cited 16×
- United States v. Tony JacksonNinth Circuit· 2022-01-03· cited 14×
- United States v. SwisherD. Idaho· 2011-07-28· cited 7×
- Tong v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2023-09-05· cited 3×
- Gilbert v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 2011-05-19· cited 1×
- United States v. HayesW.D. Virginia· 2019-01-04· cited 1×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court· 2005-06-23· cited 3,107×
- Ford v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 1,525×
- Burton v. StewartSupreme Court· 2007-01-09· cited 1,506×
- Felker v. TurpinSupreme Court· 1996-06-28· cited 1,437×
- Panetti v. QuartermanSupreme Court· 2007-06-28· cited 1,422×
- Magwood v. PattersonSupreme Court· 2010-06-24· cited 932×
- Stewart v. Martinez-VillarealSupreme Court· 1998-05-18· cited 644×
- United States v. NelsonTenth Circuit· 2006-10-06· cited 239×
- Daniel Clark Medberry v. James CrosbyEleventh Circuit· 2003-11-25· cited 221×
- Ben Abatti and Margaret Abatti v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue ServiceNinth Circuit· 1988-10-07· cited 172×
- In Re: Shane McClaine Cain, MovantFifth Circuit· 1998-03-05· cited 164×
- Jay Clint Crouch v. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction Arkansas Post Prison Transfer Board Leroy Brownlee, Chairman.Eighth Circuit· 2001-05-17· cited 160×
- Robert Benchoff v. Raymond ColleranThird Circuit· 2005-04-21· cited 153×
- Ronnie James v. James Walsh, Superintendent of Ulster Correctional FacilitySecond Circuit· 2002-10-15· cited 138×
- United States v. LopezNinth Circuit· 2009-08-18· cited 76×
- Clarence Walker v. Thomas P. RothSeventh Circuit· 1997-12-24· cited 56×
- Raymond E. Hill v. State of AlaskaNinth Circuit· 2002-07-19· cited 54×
- Curry v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2007-11-08· cited 47×
- In Re Larry Nailor, Movant. Larry Nailor v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 2007-05-31· cited 38×
Other cases named United States v. Buenrostro
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.