United States v. Robert Hairston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a numerically second petition is not “second or successive” within the meaning of § 2255(h) where it raises the vacatur of state convictions which occurred after the prior petition
• following Stewart in case where vacated prior conviction had affected defendant’s criminal history score
• finding an argument forfeited when it was raised in a party’s formal brief but omitted from its informal brief
• finding an argument forfeited when it was raised in a party’s formal brief but omitted from its informal brief
• following Stewart in case where vacated prior conviction had affected defendant’s criminal history score
• “numerically second § 2255 motion” is not barred as successive where “claim arose at a resentencing hearing afforded to a movant as a result of his first § 2255 motion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).