D.C. Circuit· 6/23/1981
United States v. Bruner
Citations
- 212 U.S. App. D.C. 36
- 657 F.2d 1278
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting severance in conspiracy cases is only “required” when the government’s evidence against the non-moving defendants is “‘far more damaging than the evidence against the moving party’” (quoting United States v. Mardian, 546 F.2d at 977)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Green, MacKinnon, Robinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-11· cited 423×
- United States v. TarantinoD.C. Circuit· 1988-04-12· cited 321×
- United States v. MooreD.C. Circuit· 2011-07-29· cited 183×
- United States v. Keith D. Long, United States of America v. Sonia E. MayfieldD.C. Circuit· 1990-06-22· cited 169×
- United States v. Clarence EvansSixth Circuit· 1989-08-25· cited 163×
- Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1990-11-16· cited 148×
- United States v. Ronald J. Perholtz, United States of America v. Franklin W. Jackson, United States of America v. Gregory W. FletcherD.C. Circuit· 1988-03-08· cited 137×
- United States v. Rufus HollandD.C. Circuit· 1987-02-06· cited 121×
- United States v. HiggsThird Circuit· 1983-08-05· cited 116×
- United States v. WalkerEleventh Circuit· 1983-12-12· cited 101×
- United States v. Hugh B. HallimanD.C. Circuit· 1991-01-15· cited 84×
- United States v. DiPasqualeThird Circuit· 1984-07-31· cited 82×
- United States v. Roberto Hernandez, United States of America v. Jose Lopez-LeyvaD.C. Circuit· 1986-01-10· cited 73×
- United States v. Harold Dean Behrens, James D. Wilkett, James M. Wilkett, and Fred WeedTenth Circuit· 1982-12-13· cited 69×
- Kindred v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1988-06-08· cited 67×
- United States v. James Brown, A/K/A Steven BrownD.C. Circuit· 1994-04-29· cited 61×
- United States v. Glenston P. LawsD.C. Circuit· 1986-12-09· cited 59×
- United States v. Diane T. Perry, United States of America v. Donald LynchD.C. Circuit· 1984-04-06· cited 57×
- Weaver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1995-07-28· cited 54×
- United States v. Stanley Harley, United States of America v. Stanley HarleyD.C. Circuit· 1982-07-16· cited 47×
Cites
46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 7,289×
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 5,119×
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-03-28· cited 4,796×
- California v. GreenSupreme Court· 1970-06-23· cited 3,363×
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court· 1970-12-15· cited 1,926×
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court· 1935-01-21· cited 1,837×
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1971-06-28· cited 1,806×
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1976-06-29· cited 1,306×
- Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-06-16· cited 734×
- United States v. HaldemanD.C. Circuit· 1976-10-12· cited 661×
- Sgro v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1932-12-05· cited 657×
- Anderson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1974-06-03· cited 571×
- United States v. Guillermo Novo Sampol, United States of America v. Alvin Ross Diaz, United States of America v. Ignacio Novo SampolD.C. Circuit· 1980-12-09· cited 283×
- Frezzo Bros. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-02-19· cited 239×
- United States v. Charles Vinson, United States of America v. Arlie B. ThompsonSixth Circuit· 1979-09-27· cited 229×
Other cases named United States v. Bruner
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.