United States v. Harold Dean Behrens, James D. Wilkett, James M. Wilkett, and Fred Weed

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• admitting summary evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 where authenticity of summary was adequately established
• admitting summary evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 where authenticity of summary was adequately established
• rejecting claim that belated Brady disclosure violated due process on the ground that “defendants have not demonstrated that the delayed disclosure of evidence deprived them of a fair trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).