United States v. Hugh B. Halliman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that prior entry did not influence decision to seek warrant not clearly erroneous
• finding that despite the inclusion of tainted information in a warrant application, “there [were] overwhelming independent grounds for probable cause” in the application
• finding that prior entry did not influence decision to seek warrant not clearly erroneous
• collecting cases from the Sixth, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits holding that compliance with Rule 8 is assessed by examining the allegations in the indictment alone
• lawful entry into hotel room based on exigent circumstances does not authorize officers to search the remainder of the room
• government may show propriety of join-der by presenting evidence after indictment but before trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).