United States v. Joseph Schesso

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a mere 20 months” was not too long to expect data to remain recoverable
• distinguishing between the case before it and CDT because CDT “involve[d] an over-seizure of data that could expose sensitive information about other individuals not implicated in any criminal activity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).