Skip to main content
· 12/9/2009

Ewing v. City of Stockton

Citations

  • 588 F.3d 1218
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 26799
  • 2009 WL 4641736

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that warrant application’s false statements about the plaintiff were not material because an independent source was sufficient to establish probable cause
  • holding that, in reviewing a challenge to a search warrant, we ask whether probable cause exists after purging false statements and correcting misleading statements
  • establishing that judicial 9 deception claim cannot prevail where the challenged affidavit “on its face establishes 10 probable cause”
  • recognizing presumption that crime victims are generally credible and noting that a crime victim’s testimony may be sufficient to establish probable cause
  • addressing claim of judicial deception in context of warrant application

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rymer, Tashima, Adelman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.