Skip to main content
· 11/2/2000

United States v. Brian Matthew Scheele

Citations

  • 231 F.3d 492
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 11741
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8854
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 27334
  • 2000 WL 1638944

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claimed Apprendi error regarding drug quantity need not be considered where defendant was sentenced to less than the statutory maximum sentence for the quantity which he acknowledged
  • “[T]he district court’s failure to consider the mar- gin of error when arriving at the quantity of drugs on which the sentence was based constitutes error. . . .”
  • estimation by multiplying estimated number of transactions by estimated average amount per transaction
  • defendant used threatening language and called police cooperator a “narc”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, Reinhardt, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.