United States v. Dariusz Piotr Kiulin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that drug quantity calculation is factual determination reviewed for clear error
• noting that a “substantial amount of ecstasy” was involved and that the defendant claimed to have “been paid well for [his] efforts”
• cash found alongside drugs was converted into drug quantity based on the estimated cost of an Ecstasy pill

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).