Skip to main content
· 6/21/2004

United States v. Ricky D. Ross

Citations

  • 372 F.3d 1097
  • 64 Fed. R. Serv. 858
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 12117
  • 4 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5412

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing a district court’s interpretation of “just and practicable” for an abuse of discretion
  • “Because no government misconduct prejudiced [defendant], dismissal of the indictment is not war- ranted.”
  • “Because no government misconduct prejudiced [defendant], dismissal of the indictment is not war- ranted.”
  • “Because no government misconduct prejudiced [defendant], dismissal of the indictment is not warranted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kozinski, Nelson, Restani

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.