Skip to main content
· 5/8/2001

United States v. Robin Sidney Saya

Citations

  • 247 F.3d 929

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Apprendi error resulted in a misapplication of the Sentencing Guidelines but that under the applicable plain error standard, no relief would be granted
  • finding that applying an incorrect offense statutory maximum for career offender purposes implicates Apprendi, but that nonetheless, plain error review still applies
  • listing factors relevant to the determination whether to conduct a hearing
  • finding harmless Apprendi error in calculation of career offender Guideline score
  • “Apprendi dealt with the consideration of facts in sentencing enhancement beyond the statutory maximum.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Noonan, McKeown, Law

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.