· 5/8/2001
United States v. Robin Sidney Saya
Citations
- 247 F.3d 929
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Apprendi error resulted in a misapplication of the Sentencing Guidelines but that under the applicable plain error standard, no relief would be granted
- finding that applying an incorrect offense statutory maximum for career offender purposes implicates Apprendi, but that nonetheless, plain error review still applies
- listing factors relevant to the determination whether to conduct a hearing
- finding harmless Apprendi error in calculation of career offender Guideline score
- “Apprendi dealt with the consideration of facts in sentencing enhancement beyond the statutory maximum.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Noonan, McKeown, Law
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.