United States v. Borowy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the file names for at least five of the files were explicitly suggestive of child pornography”
• noting that “the file names for at least five of the files were explicitly suggestive of child pornography”
• affirming district court’s holding that probable cause existed where filenames were “explicitly suggestive of child pornography”
• upholding search of computer files using file-sharing software available to the public
• soft-ware “functioned simply as a sorting mechanism to prevent the government from having to sift, one by one, through Borowy's already publically exposed files.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).