Missouri Court of Appeals· 3/28/2017
Shumate v. State
Citations
- 515 S.W.3d 824
- 2017 WL 1149163
- 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 227
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that in order to establish that counsel was ineffective in failing to file a motion to suppress, the movant must specify the grounds on which the motion to suppress would have been successful
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fischer, Howard, Witt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 2,305×
- United States v. StultsEighth Circuit· 2009-08-14· cited 212×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2013-07-16· cited 155×
- United States v. BorowyNinth Circuit· 2010-02-17· cited 48×
- United States v. ThomasSecond Circuit· 2015-06-11· cited 23×
- Michael S. Federhofer v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals· 2015-06-02· cited 18×
- State v. WoodromeMissouri Court of Appeals· 2013-09-10· cited 10×
- Eddy v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2005-11-22· cited 8×
- United States v. DodsonW.D. Texas· 2013-08-13· cited 7×
- Frazier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-11-20· cited 3×
- Bell-El v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2012-11-20· cited 3×
- Escoe v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2004-04-20· cited 1×
- State v. ShumateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2015-04-14· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.