United States v. Enrico Campanale and Donald Matthews, United States of America v. Mike Grancich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[i]t is well established that a statute increasing a penalty with respect to a criminal conspiracy which commenced prior to, but was continued beyond the effective date of the statute, is not ex post facto as to that crime”
• organized crime requires proof of continuity plus a relationship which amounts to a pattern of activity, not sporadic activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).