Supreme Court· 12/9/1946
Fiswick v. United States
Citations
- 329 U.S. 211
- 67 S. Ct. 224
- 91 L. Ed. 196
- 1946 U.S. LEXIS 1660
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- confrming that one whose conviction is vacated “stand[s] in the position of any [person] who has been accused of a crime but not yet shown to have committed it”
- finding an act “adequate” as an overt act in furtherance of one conspiracy theory but not another
- finding sufficient collateral consequences when the conviction rendered the petitioner liable to deportation and denial of naturalization, and ineligible to serve on a jury, vote, or hold office
- conviction rendered petitioner liable to deportation and denial of naturalization, and ineligible to serve on a jury, vote, or hold office
- \confession or admission by one co-conspirator after he has been apprehended is not in any sense a furtherance of the criminal enterprise\
- “The statute of limitations, unless suspended, runs from the last overt act during the existence of the conspiracy.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Douglas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
370 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 4,326×
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court· 1998-03-03· cited 3,515×
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court· 1970-12-15· cited 1,926×
- Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 1,591×
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court· 1954-02-08· cited 1,436×
- North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court· 1971-12-14· cited 1,338×
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-03-28· cited 1,293×
- Ginsberg v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 1,224×
- Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1953-03-16· cited 1,108×
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-10-10· cited 1,055×
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court· 1982-06-23· cited 795×
- Blumenthal v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-01-05· cited 757×
- Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-02-25· cited 744×
- Delli Paoli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-01-14· cited 642×
- Anderson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1974-06-03· cited 571×
- Lane v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1982-05-03· cited 490×
- Petitioner: Wesley Richard DePriest v. Respondent: The People of the State of Colorado.Supreme Court of Colorado· 2021-06-01· cited 490×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-06-10· cited 7,845×
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-10-14· cited 3,200×
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1940-06-03· cited 2,153×
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1912-06-10· cited 844×
- Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1913-06-09· cited 749×
- Bridges v. WixonSupreme Court· 1945-06-18· cited 672×
- Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1922-05-29· cited 519×
- St. Pierre v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-05-03· cited 308×
- Brown v. ElliottSupreme Court· 1912-06-10· cited 132×
- United States Ex Rel. Volpe v. SmithSupreme Court· 1933-05-22· cited 126×
- Curley v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 1904-03-01· cited 77×
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1893-11-06· cited 73×
- United States v. IrvineSupreme Court· 1879-02-18· cited 64×
- United States Ex Rel. Medich v. BurmasterEighth Circuit· 1928-01-25· cited 28×
- United States Ex Rel. Berlandi v. ReimerSecond Circuit· 1940-07-10· cited 27×
- Guarneri v. KesslerFifth Circuit· 1938-08-20· cited 20×
- Gambino v. United StatesThird Circuit· 1939-12-08· cited 13×
- Kaneda v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1922-02-13· cited 10×
- United States v. FiswickThird Circuit· 1945-12-10· cited 3×
Other cases named Fiswick v. United States
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.