· 12/12/2006
United States v. Bolivar Dexta
Citations
- 470 F.3d 612
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 30403
- 2006 WL 3589790
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating “[t]he fact that the district court did not give the defendant the exact sentence he sought is not a cognizable basis to appeal”
- “The fact that the district court did not give the defendant the exact sentence he sought is not a cognizable basis to appeal, particularly where the district court followed the mandate of § 3553(a
- “Undeniably, the district court did not explicitly consider each and every § 3553(a) factor. Although a more specific discussion of the relevant factors would have been preferable, the record is nevertheless sufficient to allow for meaningful appellate review.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Martin, Norris, Gibbons
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.