United States v. Eddie Castilla-Lugo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming district court’s application of the enhancement even though the government did not prove “other factors, such as receiving a larger share of the profits”
• “recruiting co-conspirators and planning and organizing their entrance into the conspiracy suffices to warrant the [§ 3B1.1(b)] enhancement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).