Skip to main content
· 3/2/2007

United States v. Fadya Husein

Citations

  • 478 F.3d 318
  • 72 Fed. R. Serv. 668
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 4779
  • 2007 WL 623448

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming substantial variance and noting that “more worthy defendants than Husein are difficult to imagine, short of those found to be not guilty”
  • affirming 99% variance from guideline range of 37 to 46 months to a one-day sentence
  • hesitating to “second-guess” district court’s determination under abuse-of-discretion standard of review
  • “[T]he reasons that [the district court] provide[s] for the sentence must sufficiently reflect considerations akin to those enumerated in the statute.”
  • declining to supplement the record with documents of disputed significance
  • applying rule to request on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin, Cole, Gilman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.