United States v. Bogart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 3664(f)(2) “provides that district courts must evaluate” the “financial resources,” “projected earnings,” and “financial obligations” of the defendant (emphasis added) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• applying harmless error review to procedural aspect of restitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).