United States v. James E. Simpson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming restitution order for over $4 million because “[t]he district court clearly considered the mandatory factors of financial resources, needs, and earning ability”
• Miller and its progeny do not apply to consecutive, fixed-term sentences for multiple nonhomicide offenses which may result in the functional equivalent of life without parole
• court considered mandatory factors when it adopted presentence report

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).