Ninth Circuit· 10/1/1985
United States v. Benjamin Bonam
Citations
- 772 F.2d 1449
- 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 23416
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that announce- ment of verdict 90 minutes after instruction did not raise sus- picion of coercion
- stating that announce- ment of verdict 90 minutes after instruction did not raise sus- picion of coercion
- holding one-and-a-half-hour post-Allen deliberation period “was not an immediate post-charge guilty verdict nor was the verdict rendered in such a short period of time as to raise a suspicion of coercion”
- finding ninety minutes of post-charge deliberation adequate \given the simple nature of the issue presented\
- finding no coercion with just over one day of total deliberation, one-and-a-half hours of which came after Allen charge
- jury deliberation of one and one-half hours between supplemental charge and verdict did not demonstrate coercion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hug, Boochever, George
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lowenfield v. PhelpsSupreme Court· 1988-03-07· cited 1,385×
- United States v. WestFourth Circuit· 1989-06-08· cited 223×
- United States v. NelsonNinth Circuit· 1998-02-26· cited 143×
- United States v. Alphonse Cuozzo, United States of America v. Robert Frank Stella, Jr., United States of America v. Karin Susan MonariNinth Circuit· 1992-04-27· cited 101×
- United States v. BanksNinth Circuit· 2008-01-29· cited 97×
- United States v. Richard I. Berger, United States of America v. Richard I. BergerNinth Circuit· 2007-01-18· cited 95×
- United States v. Michael A. AjiboyeNinth Circuit· 1992-04-14· cited 82×
- United States v. PlunkNinth Circuit· 1998-08-28· cited 79×
- Gregorio Jiminez v. E.R. Myers, Warden, Attorney General of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 1994-10-28· cited 77×
- United States v. EasterNinth Circuit· 1995-09-05· cited 77×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pascual Ramon HERNANDEZ, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1997-02-04· cited 67×
- United States v. Brian T. EllzeyTenth Circuit· 1991-06-24· cited 41×
- United States v. EvanstonNinth Circuit· 2011-07-05· cited 23×
- William Packer v. Don Hill, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 2002-05-06· cited 20×
- Packer v. HillNinth Circuit· 2002-01-15· cited 13×
- Gregorio Jimenez v. E.R. Myers, Warden Attorney General of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 1993-12-08· cited 12×
- Smalls v. BatistaS.D. New York· 1998-05-19· cited 10×
- United States v. BanksNinth Circuit· 2007-10-25· cited 5×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1995-09-05· cited 1×
- Unnamed caseFourth Circuit· 1989-09-01
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Michael Warren Mason, United States of America v. William Casey Welsh, United States of America v. Mitchell ShieldsNinth Circuit· 1981-12-16· cited 112×
- United States v. John Jay BeattieNinth Circuit· 1980-02-04· cited 59×
- Hamnett v. Michigan Conference of Teamsters Welfare FundSupreme Court· 1978-11-27· cited 41×
- United States v. Glenn Dale SeawellNinth Circuit· 1978-11-27· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.