United States v. Alphonse Cuozzo, United States of America v. Robert Frank Stella, Jr., United States of America v. Karin Susan Monari

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that several hours of deliberation did not raise a suspicion of coercion
• finding selective verdicts to be indicative of jury’s ability to compartmentalize the evidence
• “The fact that the jury rendered selective verdicts is highly indicative of its ability to compartmentalize the evidence.”
• “While it is helpful for an Allen charge to include such ameliorative language, its lack does not itself necessarily require reversal.”
• “The fact that the jury rendered selective verdicts is highly indicative of its ability to compartmentalize the evidence.”
• prejudice from absence of co-defendant's testimony is diminished if other sources of information document the proffered testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).