Skip to main content
· 7/5/2011

United States v. Evanston

Citations

  • 651 F.3d 1080
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 13647
  • 2011 WL 2619277

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a new trial was necessary where the jury had deliberated for two hours after receiving an Allen charge and hearing supplemental arguments
  • stating that the district court is to manage the trial so as to avoid causing \a significant risk of undermining the defendant's due process rights to a fair trial and impartial jury\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kozinski, Hawkins, Gould

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.