· 7/5/2011
United States v. Evanston
Citations
- 651 F.3d 1080
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 13647
- 2011 WL 2619277
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a new trial was necessary where the jury had deliberated for two hours after receiving an Allen charge and hearing supplemental arguments
- stating that the district court is to manage the trial so as to avoid causing \a significant risk of undermining the defendant's due process rights to a fair trial and impartial jury\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kozinski, Hawkins, Gould
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.