UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pascual Ramon HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that forty minutes of deliberation after Allen charge was “not so short as to raise the specter of coercion,” especially because the jury had already deliberated for four and a half hours
• holding that forty minutes of deliberation after Allen charge was “not so short as to raise the specter of coercion,” especially because the jury had already deliberated for four and a half hours
• holding that prior deportation order and defendant's admissions constituted sufficient proof of alienage
• noting that “Hernandez told [the government agent] that he had entered the United States by scaling the border fence with Mexico”
• noting that \Hernandez told [the government agent] that he had entered the United States by scaling the border fence with Mexico\
• holding that comment concerning retrial to jury was not coercive because it was made in the context of “the district court’s statement that no other set of jurors would be better equipped to decide the case than this jury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).