Ninth Circuit· 1/20/2011
United States v. Basher
Citations
- 629 F.3d 1161
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 1064
- 2011 WL 167045
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a head nod was sufficiently specific because it “clearly defin[ed] who would enter the tent (his son) and the scope of the activity (bringing the gun outside)”
- taking judicial 26 notice of the Bureau of Prisons’ inmate locator available to the public
- taking judicial notice of Bureau of Prisons’ inmate locator available 24 || to the public
- taking judicial notice of 8 the BOP inmate locator website that is available to the public
- taking judicial notice of the BOP inmate locator website that is available to the public
- taking 16 judicial notice of Bureau of Prisons inmate locator that is available to the public
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wardlaw, Gould, Mills
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Johnson v. Bay Area Rapid Transit DistrictNinth Circuit· 2013-07-30· cited 86×
- Goodman v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police DepartmentD. Nevada· 2013-08-02· cited 37×
- Ghaster v. City of Rocky RiverN.D. Ohio· 2012-09-26· cited 27×
- United States v. Xzavione TaylorNinth Circuit· 2023-03-01· cited 27×
- People v. NishiCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-07-13· cited 25×
- United States v. Joshua LucasNinth Circuit· 2016-11-08· cited 21×
- State v. DainoSupreme Court of Kansas· 2020-11-13· cited 10×
- United States v. Wei Seng PhuaD. Nevada· 2015-04-17· cited 3×
- United States v. EscobarN.D. California· 2018-02-16· cited 2×
- Estate of Wasilchen v. GohrmanW.D. Washington· 2012-04-25· cited 2×
- United States v. Markanthony SapalasanNinth Circuit· 2024-04-01· cited 2×
- State v. Richard L. BeckIdaho Court of Appeals· 2014-10-08· cited 1×
- United States v. AbarzaD. Oregon· 2015-11-06· cited 1×
- State of Tennessee v. Brian Anthony WileyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2020-01-21
- Tekoh v. County of Los AngelesC.D. California· 2017-08-31
- United States v. DiskinD. Montana· 2019-03-04
- United States v. Aruiza-AndradeD. Oregon· 2019-03-29
- United States v. Van LithNinth Circuit· 2013-03-15
- State v. MitchellIdaho Court of Appeals· 2025-01-07
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 4,647×
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court· 2005-01-24· cited 2,007×
- New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court· 1984-06-12· cited 1,468×
- United States v. DunnSupreme Court· 1987-04-20· cited 1,336×
- Muehler v. MenaSupreme Court· 2005-03-22· cited 937×
- Demis v. SniezekSixth Circuit· 2009-03-09· cited 255×
- United States v. ShaibuNinth Circuit· 1990-02-14· cited 166×
- United States v. Jorge Negrete-Gonzales, United States of America v. Rogelio Mendoza-BarajasNinth Circuit· 1992-06-02· cited 158×
- United States v. Herman Patayan SorianoNinth Circuit· 2004-03-11· cited 142×
- United States v. StruckmanNinth Circuit· 2010-05-04· cited 134×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Remigio CHAN-JIMENEZ, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1997-10-01· cited 133×
- United States v. Kenneth D. GoochNinth Circuit· 1993-10-06· cited 119×
- United States v. Lionel MendezNinth Circuit· 2007-02-23· cited 89×
- Stanley v. SchriroNinth Circuit· 2010-03-11· cited 84×
- United States v. Lawrence Ezekiel Reid, United States of America v. Wayne BlakeNinth Circuit· 2000-09-14· cited 84×
- United States v. Berber-TinocoNinth Circuit· 2007-12-19· cited 83×
- United States v. Francis Joseph Reilly, AKA Ian MacCormick AKA Steven James ConnerNinth Circuit· 2000-09-11· cited 73×
- United States v. Gunner Lawson CrapserNinth Circuit· 2007-01-10· cited 42×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.