United States v. Jorge Negrete-Gonzales, United States of America v. Rogelio Mendoza-Barajas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that fundamental Rule 41 violations are those that result in constitutional violations
• dividing Rule 41 violations into two categories, fundamental and technical, and explaining that “[fundamental errors are those that result in clear constitutional violations”
• “Prejudice in this context means the search would otherwise not have occurred or would have been less intrusive absent the error.”
• “Technical errors . . . require suppression only if: (1) the defendants were 6 prejudiced by the error, or (2) there is evidence of deliberate disregard of the rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).