UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Remigio CHAN-JIMENEZ, Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant's failure to respond verbally to officer's request to search his truck supports the argument that defendant did not voluntarily consent the search
• concluding that defendant's failure to respond verbally to officer's request to search his truck supports the argument that defendant did not voluntarily consent the search
• holding that a seizure occurs when an officer retains a citizen’s driver’s license or registration “longer than necessary to ascertain that everything is in order, and initiates further inquiry while holding on to the needed papers”
• holding that a Fourth Amendment seizure had occurred
• noting that consent was not voluntary when officer’s request for permission to search was made “with one hand resting on [the officer’s] gun”
• weighing a threat from police to take away defendant’s children in determining whether her consent to search was coerced or voluntary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).