Supreme Court· 1/20/1969

United States v. Augenblick

Citations

393 U.S. 348
89 S. Ct. 528
21 L. Ed. 2d 537
1969 U.S. LEXIS 2855

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the loss of both notes and tape recordings of interviews with government witnesses did not constitute a denial of due process
holding that the loss of both notes and tape recordings of interviews with government witnesses did not constitute a denial of due process
holding that habeas corpus was not available to a naval officer who was dismissed from service and not imprisoned
holding that the failure to produce rough notes which were not verbatim statements and therefore did not fall within Jencks Act, and tapes which were Jencks Act materials, did not present a case that was a “worthy candidate for consideration at the constitutional level”
stating that there was “no doubt” that lost “tapes were covered by the Jencks Act”
noting that when violations, of the Jencks Act occur, the imposition of sanctions is left to the trial court’s discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

402 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Augenblick

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.