United States v. John Fioravanti, Nicholas Panaccione, and Angelo Pepe, Nicholas Panaccione

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding impermissibly coercive a supplemental jury instruction telling jurors who held the minority viewpoint to reconsider their position
• criticizing the use of supplemental charges to “blast a hung jury into a ver diet”
• finding impermissibly coercive a supplemental jury instruction telling jurors who held the minority viewpoint to reconsider their position
• exercising the court’s supervisory power over the federal district courts to prohibit a court from issuing charges to a potentially deadlocked jury that they, especially the dissenting jurors, should make additional efforts to come to a consensus
• where injection of inadmissible evidence is attributable to action of defense, introduction does not constitute reversible error
• a defendant has no right to discover the minutia of the government’s evidence or the manner in which it will be used

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).