United States v. Arthur Sutton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \rare\ is the \case in which we should attempt to refigure the trial court's assessment of the probative worth/prejudicial impact calculus\
• relying on factual complexity of case as factor -in conclusion that trial court did not err in allowing juror questioning
• upholding lower court's decision to ask a few \bland\ juror questions that had a \relatively high\ positive value given the case's complexity
• “Because this was a factually complex case in which a greater-than-average risk of jury confusion existed, the positive value of allowing juror-inspired questioning was relatively high.”
• “Because this was a factually complex case in which a greater-than-average risk of jury confusion existed, the positive value of allowing juror-inspired questioning was relatively high.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).