Skip to main content
· 12/14/1988

Donna Reilly, Etc. v. United States

Citations

  • 863 F.2d 149
  • 27 Fed. R. Serv. 90
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 17018
  • 1988 WL 132278

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding denial of discovery request where supposedly aggrieved party did not accept the magistrate's invitation to renew it at a later date
  • reviewing appointment of technical advis- or for an abuse of discretion
  • discussing difference between expert witnesses and technical advisors under Federal Rule 706
  • “appointment of a technical advisor must arise out of some cognizable judicial need for specialized skills”
  • “[D]amages in an FTCA suit . . . must be assessed in conformity with state law.”
  • “When a tortfeasor loses at trial, then — absent a statute or the parties’ contrary agreement, ... — it must pay the judgment in one fell swoop.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bownes, Selya, Caffrey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.