United States v. Arthur Danielson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that indictment, which alleged that defendant possessed \7 rounds of .45 calibre ammunition\ was not constructively amended when jury charge permitted jury to convict on basis of possession of shells, rather than full rounds
• holding that indictment, which alleged that defendant possessed \7 rounds of .45 calibre ammunition\ was not constructively amended when jury charge permitted jury to convict on basis of possession of shells, rather than full rounds
• determining that the defendant had sufficient notice of the charge against him where the indictment outlined the essence of the offense, even if it lacked specific details of the ammunition at issue
• tying conviction to possession of ammunition “shells” seized during same arrest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).