Kuhali v. Reno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the aggravated felony definitions have retroactive application
• acknowledging that all Article III 5 courts possess the “inherent jurisdiction . . . to determine their jurisdiction”
• acknowledging that all Article III courts possess the “inherent jurisdiction . . . to determine their jurisdiction”
• commenting that among the virtues of the categorical approach is that “examining the transcript of the plea colloquy (or the trial) to determine the actual facts of the crime could prove burdensome and produce arbitrary results”
• granting “Chevron deference to the 15 Board’s construction of the INA, which it . . . administer[s]”
• granting “Chevron deference to the Board’s construction of the INA, which it . . . administer[s]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).