Skip to main content
· 10/18/1995

United States v. Vital

Citations

  • 68 F.3d 114
  • 1995 WL 613322

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \A presentence report is considered reliable and may be considered as evidence by the trial judge in making sentencing determinations.\
  • factual issues which are capable of resolution by the district court cannot rise to the level of plain error
  • “Vital failed to present any evidence to support his objection to the court’s reliance on the information set forward in the PSR pertaining to August’s testimony. Consequently, the district court’s reliance on the PSR was not clearly erroneous.”
  • the district court may consider information in the presentence report as reliable evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garwood, Duhé, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.