United States v. John C. Mueller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that solution that had not yet been processed into usable methamphetamine was a “mixture” under guidelines
• stating that defendant did not carry its burden because he presented no evidence in rebuttal to the presentence report
• “Nothing suggests that the magistrate had any bias or interest in issuing the warrant, or that he dispensed with his neutral and detached position to become involved in the evidence-gathering related to issuance of the warrant as did the town justice in Lo-Ji Sales.”
• “Nothing suggests that the magistrate had any bias or interest in issuing the warrant, or that he dispensed with his neutral and detached position to become involved in the evidence-gathering related to issuance of the warrant as did the town justice in Lo-Ji Sales.”
• “because the district court merely adopted the PSI’s findings, the PSI provided Mueller with adequate notice of all the issues that the district court resolved at the sentencing hearing”
• “The denial of a Franks hearing is reviewed de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).