United States v. Almaraz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that we presume the jury follows its instructions
• relying on United States v. LaH ue, 261 F.3d 993, 1009 (10th Cir. 2001), and Femedeer v. Haun, 227 F.3d 1244, 1255 (10th Cir. 2000)
• relying on United States v. LaH ue, 261 F.3d 993, 1009 (10th Cir. 2001), and Femedeer v. Haun, 227 F.3d 1244, 1255 (10th Cir. 2000)
• this Court will consider circumstantial evidence in determining if the government has presented sufficient evidence supporting the defendant's CCE conviction
• “We presume jurors attend closely to the language of the instructions in a criminal case and follow the instructions given them.”
• “We presume jurors attend closely to the language of the instructions in a criminal case and follow the instructions given them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).