United States v. Alfred Lee Apodaca

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the entire trial record, not just the indictment, may be referred to in protecting against double jeopardy in the event of subsequent prosecution
• affirming the use of a leg chain when the judge articulated safety reasons and took “precautions to ensure that any prejudicial effect of the physical restraint was minimized”
• affirming the use of a leg chain when the judge articulated safety reasons and took “precautions to ensure that any prejudicial effect of the physical restraint was minimized”
• affirming the use of a leg chain when the judge articulated safety reasons and took “precautions to ensure that any prejudicial effect of the physical restraint was minimized”
• stating entire record, not just indictment, may be consulted in protecting against double jeopardy
• entire record, not just indictment, may be referred to in protecting against double jeopardy in event of subsequent prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).