United States v. O'Brien (Dorothy)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding defendant need not know that gambling business violated state law
• admitting ledger from a gambling operation that included entries outside the charged period of the conspiracy because they were intertwined with the charged criminal acts
• Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) does not apply to gambling records inextricably intertwined with evidence of crime charged
• “It is well settled that Rule 404(b) does not apply to other act evidence that is intrinsic to the crime charged. . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).