UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John DOE, a Juvenile Male, Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant's question \What time will I see a lawyer?\ was ambiguous under Davis
• holding that “a statement concerning an attorney made before interrogation begins is far less likely to be a request for attorney assistance during interrogation than a similar statement made during custodial interrogation”
• concluding that the defendant’s question, “What time will I see a lawyer?” was “an inquiry regarding the time at which appointed counsel would be made available” rather than an unequivocal invocation of his right to counsel
• finding that the text of the JDA does not allow for delegation to a “subsequent official who might handle the judicial phases of the matter”
• asking “What time will I see a lawyer?” did not invoke right
• “What time will I see a lawyer?”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).