Roy Richard Dittman v. State of California State and Consumer Affairs Agency Medical Board of California Acupuncture Committee and Marilyn Nielsen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a law that imposes a \`complete prohibition' on entry into a profession ... implicates a person's liberty interest in pursuing an occupation or profession of her choice\
• holding that 13 the court has an independent obligation to determine sua sponte whether a case is moot
• holding that a law that imposes a “ ‘complete prohibition’ on entry into a profession . . . implicates a person’s liberty interest in pursu- ing an occupation or profession of her choice”
• holding we have an independent obligation to address sua sponte whether a case is moot
• holding complete prohibition implicates person’s 23 liberty interest in pursuing an occupation or profession of her choice
• emphasizing that an appellate “court may affirm on any ground supported by the record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).