Fifth Circuit· 2/24/1986
United States v. Albert B. Bowman
Citations
- 783 F.2d 1192
- 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22918
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that implementation of a “lulling scheme” satisfied the in furtherance requirement
- affirming a conviction with a three-month variance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson, Jolly, Mitchell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. PowersFifth Circuit· 1999-02-25· cited 172×
- United States v. FergusonFifth Circuit· 2000-05-04· cited 127×
- United States v. CisnerosFifth Circuit· 1997-05-13· cited 101×
- United States v. Eugene HanniganThird Circuit· 1994-06-23· cited 80×
- United States v. Perry G. BlockerFifth Circuit· 1997-01-16· cited 64×
- United States v. Willia AllenFifth Circuit· 1996-02-28· cited 63×
- United States v. Billy L. Massey and Larry P. WagesFifth Circuit· 1987-09-03· cited 57×
- United States v. Shearn Moody, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1990-05-30· cited 51×
- United States v. Douglas James HordFifth Circuit· 1993-10-22· cited 46×
- United States v. Peter BellucciNinth Circuit· 1993-06-04· cited 41×
- United States v. Wordy Jack Thompson, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1987-02-19· cited 37×
- United States v. KeyEleventh Circuit· 1996-02-28· cited 29×
- United States v. Phillip R. WhiteSeventh Circuit· 1989-08-14· cited 29×
- United States v. Ray Dell DevollFifth Circuit· 1994-11-28· cited 29×
- United States v. Karen Ruth Gordon and David R. WoodcockFifth Circuit· 1987-03-09· cited 27×
- United States v. Ismael Holguin HerreraFifth Circuit· 2002-04-17· cited 27×
- United States v. William R. MetalloEleventh Circuit· 1990-10-05· cited 25×
- United States v. McDowFifth Circuit· 1994-07-14· cited 21×
- United States v. David James Solomon, A/K/A Davis James CormierFifth Circuit· 1994-09-08· cited 19×
- United States v. Ronald Carl Wall, Jr.Sixth Circuit· 1997-11-21· cited 18×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1942-02-09· cited 10,035×
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1954-02-01· cited 1,531×
- United States v. Nelson BellFifth Circuit· 1982-06-01· cited 819×
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1982-06-29· cited 389×
- United States v. John L. MorrowFifth Circuit· 1976-08-16· cited 233×
- Peterson v. MathewsSupreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 162×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,032 United States of America v. Edward Henry Ashdown and Charles E. Graham, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1975-04-17· cited 116×
- United States v. Charles Goss and George C. BensonFifth Circuit· 1981-07-06· cited 94×
- United States v. Paul E. DavisFifth Circuit· 1985-01-25· cited 91×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1982-01-11· cited 87×
- United States v. Bobby Cochran, A/K/A \Sundance\, Teddy Doyle Butler and Bobby Fred WilliamsonFifth Circuit· 1983-01-24· cited 86×
- United States v. Robert L. Grapp and William Kenneth ThatcherFifth Circuit· 1981-08-10· cited 65×
- United States v. David Ivan Goodman, A/K/A Charles Riccardi and David Lash, and Paul AlexanderwestFifth Circuit· 1979-11-01· cited 64×
- United States v. Orrin Shaid, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1984-04-06· cited 56×
- United States v. James A. WomackFifth Circuit· 1981-08-31· cited 52×
- United States v. Daniel J. LedesmaSeventh Circuit· 1980-09-03· cited 51×
- Saunders v. United States Postal ServiceSupreme Court· 1984-10-01· cited 40×
- United States v. Ben M. Hogan Co., Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1985-09-20· cited 36×
- United States v. Peter SabatinoSecond Circuit· 1973-10-05· cited 34×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.