United States v. Willia Allen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “actions taken to avoid detection, or to lull the fraud victim into complacency” are in furtherance of the fraud for the purpose of the wire fraud statute
• holding that actions designed to avoid detection after the defendants had control over the money produced by the fraud were in furtherance of the fraud under the mail fraud statute
• holding that actions designed to avoid detection after the defendants had control over the money produced by the fraud were in furtherance of the fraud under the mail fraud statute
• concluding that fraud scheme \produces proceeds at the latest when the scheme succeeds in disgorging the funds from the vic- tim and placing them into the control of the perpetrators\
• bank was defrauded, at least temporarily, when cashier's checks were fraudulently drawn on bank's account, even though bank was reimbursed in full by holding company at end of month
• “we review only for plain error and we find none.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).