Skip to main content
· 6/4/1993

United States v. Peter Bellucci

Citations

  • 995 F.2d 157
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 6950
  • 38 Fed. R. Serv. 1384
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4067
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 13100
  • 1993 WL 186672

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[t]he proponent of a writing at trial must overcome authentication, best evidence, and hearsay objections”
  • there is no question but that an FDIC certificate of insurance is sufficient proof of bank's federally insured status
  • “If the significance of an offered statement lies solely in the fact that it was made, no issue is raised as to the truth of anything asserted, and the statement is not hearsay.”
  • “If the significance of an offered statement lies solely in the fact that it was made, no issue is raised as to the truth of anything asserted, and the statement is not hearsay.”
  • “If the significance of an offered statement lies solely in the fact that it was made, no issue is raised as to the truth of anything asserted, and the statement is not hearsay.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hug, Wiggins, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.