Washington Supreme Court· 10/5/1995
Union Bay Pres. Coal. v. COSMOS DEVELOP.
Citations
- 902 P.2d 1247
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to apply doctrine of substantial compliance to APA requirement that all \parties of record” be served with Petition for Review because of \unequivocal definition of 'party’ in the APA” and legislative history
- all statutory requirements must be met in order to properly invoke a superior court's appellate jurisdiction
- because petitioner failed to serve the parties of record as required by RCW 34.05.542(2), superior court lacked jurisdiction
- all statutory requirements must be met in order to properly invoke a superior court’s appellate jurisdiction
- substantial compliance may apply in cases involving service of process
- substantial compliance may apply in cases involving service of process
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Guy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Skagit Surveyors v. FRIENDS OF SKAGITWashington Supreme Court· 1998-06-25· cited 163×
- Skagit Surveyors & Engineers, LLC v. Friends of Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1998-06-25· cited 161×
- Dougherty v. DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRIESWashington Supreme Court· 2003-09-25· cited 120×
- Dougherty v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court· 2003-09-25· cited 119×
- Medina v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court· 2002-09-12· cited 80×
- Marilyn M. Marshall v. Mikel WarwickEighth Circuit· 1998-12-04· cited 79×
- Medina v. Public Utility Dist. No. 1Washington Supreme Court· 2002-09-12· cited 79×
- In Re Detention of AsWashington Supreme Court· 1999-09-09· cited 72×
- State v. A.S.Washington Supreme Court· 1999-09-09· cited 72×
- Sheldon v. FettigWashington Supreme Court· 1996-08-01· cited 70×
- Mader v. Health Care AuthorityWashington Supreme Court· 2003-06-05· cited 55×
- Weiss v. GlempWashington Supreme Court· 1995-10-12· cited 53×
- Overhulse Neighborhood Ass'n v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-03-05· cited 52×
- Residents Opposed Turbines v. State EfsecWashington Supreme Court· 2008-11-20· cited 50×
- Black v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court· 1997-04-03· cited 47×
- Black v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court· 1997-04-03· cited 47×
- Residents Opposed to Kittitas Turbines v. State Energy Facility Site Evaluation CouncilWashington Supreme Court· 2008-11-20· cited 47×
- Witt v. Port of OlympiaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-04-05· cited 40×
- Okanogan Wilderness League, Inc. v. Town of TwispWashington Supreme Court· 1997-12-04· cited 36×
- King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-03-02· cited 28×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
- State v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court· 1995-04-27· cited 258×
- In Re F.D. Processing, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1992-07-23· cited 159×
- City of Seattle v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court· 1991-05-16· cited 121×
- Tarnopol v. Connecticut Siting CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-07-18· cited 117×
- In Re the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of SantoreCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-01-30· cited 112×
- Fay v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1990-09-06· cited 94×
- In Re SaltisWashington Supreme Court· 1980-12-24· cited 81×
- Union Bay Preservation Coalition v. Cosmos Development & Administration Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1995-10-05· cited 71×
- Thayer v. EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1972-12-06· cited 67×
- Curtis Lumber Co. v. SortorWashington Supreme Court· 1974-05-29· cited 58×
- Martin v. TriolWashington Supreme Court· 1993-03-18· cited 56×
- Nitardy v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1986-01-16· cited 42×
- Meadowdale Neighborhood Committee v. City of EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1980-09-15· cited 36×
- Petta v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-12-07· cited 33×
- Hoirup v. Empire Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-04-26· cited 28×
- Vasquez v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-07-17· cited 28×
- Reiner v. Pittsburg Des Moines Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1984-04-19· cited 24×
- Associated Gen. Contractors of Washington v. KING CTY.Washington Supreme Court· 1994-10-06· cited 22×
- Muncie v. Westcraft Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1961-03-30· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.