Nitardy v. Snohomish County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that substantial compliance with the provisions of RCW 4.28.080(1) is no defense to improper service of process, the service must exactly comply with the statute's provisions
• holding that substantial compliance with the provisions of RCW 4.28.080(1) is no defense to improper service of process, the service must exactly comply with the statute’s provisions
• holding that service on the secretary to the county executive is insufficient when the service statute specifically named the county auditor as the person to receive service in actions against the county
• sections of RCW 4.28.080 are clear and explicit in requirements of service and call into question the Reiner case
• service on county executive's secretary insufficient where statute required service on county auditor
• service on county executive’s secretary insufficient where statute required service on county auditor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).