Curtis Lumber Co. v. Sortor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that \the basic purpose of the new rules of civil procedure [for superior court] is to eliminate or at least minimize technical miscarriages ofjustice inherent in archaic procedural concepts\
• observing that \the basic purpose of the new rules of civil procedure [for superior court] is to eliminate or at least minimize technical miscarriages of justice inherent in archaic procedural concepts\
• 90-day rule of RCW 4.16.170 applies to mechanics' liens filed within 8-month limit pursuant to former RCW 60.04.100

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• In re the Detention of Turay
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-10-21· cited 217×
• In Re Saltis
  Washington Supreme Court· 1980-12-24· cited 81×
• North Street Ass'n v. City of Olympia
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-08-09· cited 75×
• Union Bay Pres. Coal. v. COSMOS DEVELOP.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-10-05· cited 71×
• Union Bay Preservation Coalition v. Cosmos Development & Administration Corp.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-10-05· cited 71×
• In Re Hunters Run Limited Partnership, Debtor. Miner Corporation, and John Hand, Dba/sunny Day Cement Company v. Hunters Run Limited Partnership
  Ninth Circuit· 1989-05-26· cited 61×
• Martin v. Triol
  Washington Supreme Court· 1993-03-18· cited 56×
• In Re Detention of Turay
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-12-22· cited 46×
• First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Ekanger
  Washington Supreme Court· 1980-06-26· cited 35×
• DGHI, ENTERPRISES v. Pacific Cities, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-05-13· cited 34×
• Vaughn v. Chung
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-06-04· cited 32×
• Griffith v. City of Bellevue
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-09-12· cited 30×
• Vasquez v. Department of Labor & Industries
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-07-17· cited 28×
• Citizens Interested in the Transfusion of Yesteryear v. Board of Regents of the University of Washington
  Washington Supreme Court· 1976-01-08· cited 24×
• DIVERSIFIED WOOD RECYCLING, INC. v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-05-16· cited 23×
• Pacific Erectors, Inc. v. Gall Landau Young Construction Co.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-09-30· cited 21×
• Gott v. Woody
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1974-06-28· cited 20×
• Stanley v. Cole
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2010-09-27· cited 19×
• Moore v. Wentz
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1974-08-08· cited 18×
• Seattle Seahawks, Inc. v. King County
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-03-29· cited 16×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Peterson v. Dillon
  Washington Supreme Court· 1901-12-26· cited 43×
• Davis v. Bartz
  Washington Supreme Court· 1911-10-24· cited 33×
• City Sash & Door Co. v. Bunn
  Washington Supreme Court· 1916-04-19· cited 30×
• Deming Investment Co. v. Ely
  Washington Supreme Court· 1899-04-26· cited 25×
• Galvanizer's Co. v. State Highway Commission
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1973-04-19· cited 12×
• Rees v. Wilson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1908-09-15· cited 6×
• Curtis Lumber Co. v. Sortor
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1973-10-04· cited 3×

Other cases named Curtis Lumber Co. v. Sortor

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Curtis Lumber Co. v. Sortor
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1973-10-04· cited 3×