Skip to main content
· 3/7/2001

Aguilera v. Kirkpatrick

Citations

  • 241 F.3d 1286
  • 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 1281
  • 2001 Daily Journal DAR 1281
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 3426
  • 2001 WL 223295

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that a habeas petition should be dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim
  • recognizing that where a district court dismisses a complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, we may affirm dismissal of the complaint for failure to state a claim under the same standards
  • stating that even if the district court had erroneously ordered dismissal on jurisdictional grounds, we can affirm for failure to state a valid claim because a remand would be futile
  • noting that a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition may “be dismissed...under Rule 12(b)(6)”
  • discussing the appropriateness of a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal in proceedings arising under § 2241
  • discussing the appropriateness of a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal in proceedings arising under § 2241

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tacha, McWilliams, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.