Maria Del Consuelo Cevilla v. Alberto R. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that \the general 'no law to apply' principle of judicial review of administrative action has been superseded in the immigration context by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2) [ (D) ]\
• “[A] mere procedural or evidentiary error must not be confused with a denial of due process.”
• “[W]hile the purpose of the door-closing statute appears to be to place discretionary rulings beyond the power of judicial review (hence the caption of subsection (B)
• Even if the agency action was “so wacky as to constitute a denial of due process of law . . . a procedural entitlement is not a liberty interest.”
• application of law to facts does not constitute a reviewable due process claim
• “[Petitioner] has a liberty interest in remaining in the United States.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).