Skip to main content
· 12/8/2005

UFJ Bank Ltd. v. Ieda

Citations

  • 123 P.3d 1232
  • 109 Haw. 137
  • 2005 Haw. LEXIS 608

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying HRCP Rule 19’s federal counterpart, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) Rule 1911
  • “forum non conveniens cannot be said to fall within the scope of the defense of improper venue” and therefore it is not waived by failing to raise it in a responsive pleading

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.